Manicrack
04-25-2005, 05:43 PM
This thread (http://burningwheel.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1164) got me thinking about something.
Why do all minor spirits have to be bound to a summoner's will?
It totally makes sense that spirits can be bound and can be forced to do your bidding, but I feel there should be more.
Example scenario:
A druid like character wants to prevent a gang of orcs to burn down his forest. To do so he calls to the great spirit of the forest and asks for help.
Now, it would deffenitely be in the spirit's interest to not see the forest burn, right?
if we could replace the binding with a duel of wits in some cases, I think it would make a really cool game. Also there would be no, or only a very little grudge against the summoner, since he served the spirit's interest.
Basically, the spirit and the summoner would be striking somehwta of an alliance, with contributions from both sides.
Am I loosing the concept here or do you at leats understand what I mean?
-Crack
Why do all minor spirits have to be bound to a summoner's will?
It totally makes sense that spirits can be bound and can be forced to do your bidding, but I feel there should be more.
Example scenario:
A druid like character wants to prevent a gang of orcs to burn down his forest. To do so he calls to the great spirit of the forest and asks for help.
Now, it would deffenitely be in the spirit's interest to not see the forest burn, right?
if we could replace the binding with a duel of wits in some cases, I think it would make a really cool game. Also there would be no, or only a very little grudge against the summoner, since he served the spirit's interest.
Basically, the spirit and the summoner would be striking somehwta of an alliance, with contributions from both sides.
Am I loosing the concept here or do you at leats understand what I mean?
-Crack