TnT
01-21-2006, 09:08 AM
OK, what is the difference (defensively) between two-fisted (and doing the combinded strike/block move) and counterstrike?
This came into play in our last game night, it appears that two-fisted is actually a _weaker_ skill defensively than choosing the counterstrike option.
1. Counterstrike defends against: Strike, Great Strike, Disarm and Push
2. Two-fisted (strike/block) defends against: Strike, Disarm, Beat
If you have a dagger in the off hand - both get +1 die. So, other than defending against Beat, the fighter with two-fisted should usually choose counterstrike - rather than strike.
Now, if you have shield training, you get to add Great Strike to the list of "defends against". So that makes sense. It is just that the two-fisted option does not seem to give you very much.
Offensively it gives you a little - if you have a slow weapon in each hand, you can still script strike each action - thus gaining a small offensive advantage (another question, can you script strike-counterstrike with a slow weapon?)
Thanks
This came into play in our last game night, it appears that two-fisted is actually a _weaker_ skill defensively than choosing the counterstrike option.
1. Counterstrike defends against: Strike, Great Strike, Disarm and Push
2. Two-fisted (strike/block) defends against: Strike, Disarm, Beat
If you have a dagger in the off hand - both get +1 die. So, other than defending against Beat, the fighter with two-fisted should usually choose counterstrike - rather than strike.
Now, if you have shield training, you get to add Great Strike to the list of "defends against". So that makes sense. It is just that the two-fisted option does not seem to give you very much.
Offensively it gives you a little - if you have a slow weapon in each hand, you can still script strike each action - thus gaining a small offensive advantage (another question, can you script strike-counterstrike with a slow weapon?)
Thanks