vertigo25
06-19-2007, 01:36 AM
Todays stupid question is brought to you by the letter V and the number 25...
It's a "Setting" if there's a Born, and Sub-Setting if there isn't... yes? Is that the only qualifying difference?
Also... is it just me, or is it really whacky that someone could, if they *really* wanted to, play a character who was Born Noble, became a Page, then a Squire, then a Night, then a Lord, and then suddenly shifted gears and became a Servant?
[Yes... I could easily conceive of a Noble who for some reason looses all of his servants and spends 6 years doing his own dishes... It's still whacky]
I've seen some other kinds of (mildly) weird things, but my question here, really, is... are the LPs intended to always be considered literal? If a player ends up taking something to maybe get a lead to something he *really* wants, but he doesn't think that particular option fits in with his character concept (perhaps it makes him too old, maybe it gives him a trait that *really* doesn't fit... whatever...), would you (as GM) feel that he should make that literal LP part of his background, or would you allow him to fudge it by changing the name of the LP to something more appropriate, or even perhaps changing the req'd Trait (as in the "doesn't fit" example)?
I guess, to put it more succinctly, if you're Born Village, can your background story say you were born in London?
It's a "Setting" if there's a Born, and Sub-Setting if there isn't... yes? Is that the only qualifying difference?
Also... is it just me, or is it really whacky that someone could, if they *really* wanted to, play a character who was Born Noble, became a Page, then a Squire, then a Night, then a Lord, and then suddenly shifted gears and became a Servant?
[Yes... I could easily conceive of a Noble who for some reason looses all of his servants and spends 6 years doing his own dishes... It's still whacky]
I've seen some other kinds of (mildly) weird things, but my question here, really, is... are the LPs intended to always be considered literal? If a player ends up taking something to maybe get a lead to something he *really* wants, but he doesn't think that particular option fits in with his character concept (perhaps it makes him too old, maybe it gives him a trait that *really* doesn't fit... whatever...), would you (as GM) feel that he should make that literal LP part of his background, or would you allow him to fudge it by changing the name of the LP to something more appropriate, or even perhaps changing the req'd Trait (as in the "doesn't fit" example)?
I guess, to put it more succinctly, if you're Born Village, can your background story say you were born in London?