Ambrosius
06-16-2004, 06:43 PM
Just got the books today. Reminds me a lot of the original D&D three booklet set. Very nice old school feel. Couple of quick notes:
At one point the char creation book seems to indicate that the GM should pick a life path limit (generally 3 or 4) and enforce it. In others it seems to say that total number of life paths is limited only by how old you want your character to be (shades of Ars Magica there, then again Ars had years between adventures).
There dosn't seem to be a Page anywhere in the Elven life paths even though several say that Page is a possible prereq (its the only way to get to Prince in 4 life paths).
Advisor to the Court: Requires a master level character but neither sorcerer or court sorcerer is listed. I realize this is probably for game balance (YOU don't get to play Merlin) but ....
Speaking of Nobles the rank system seems a bit out of kilter. I seem to remember that Counts (at least in France) were not small land holders. Even English Barons would be around Vice Count Level. Maybe rich lord and poor lord for +20/ +40 and move everything else up a level?
Also if I'm remembering right "Fee" is old english for Fief so land would be held in Knight Fee (a fudual tenure) not as a "knight's Fee" (which would imply ownership). This is why at common law land ownership is technically termed owenership in "fee simple diffesable" (Simple ownership with the right to sell it).
Steve
At one point the char creation book seems to indicate that the GM should pick a life path limit (generally 3 or 4) and enforce it. In others it seems to say that total number of life paths is limited only by how old you want your character to be (shades of Ars Magica there, then again Ars had years between adventures).
There dosn't seem to be a Page anywhere in the Elven life paths even though several say that Page is a possible prereq (its the only way to get to Prince in 4 life paths).
Advisor to the Court: Requires a master level character but neither sorcerer or court sorcerer is listed. I realize this is probably for game balance (YOU don't get to play Merlin) but ....
Speaking of Nobles the rank system seems a bit out of kilter. I seem to remember that Counts (at least in France) were not small land holders. Even English Barons would be around Vice Count Level. Maybe rich lord and poor lord for +20/ +40 and move everything else up a level?
Also if I'm remembering right "Fee" is old english for Fief so land would be held in Knight Fee (a fudual tenure) not as a "knight's Fee" (which would imply ownership). This is why at common law land ownership is technically termed owenership in "fee simple diffesable" (Simple ownership with the right to sell it).
Steve