Blackberry
06-28-2004, 10:52 AM
I thought this had been asked before, but I couldn't find it in the forums or the errata.
My group burned characters on Saturday. We had one character who had a Forte of B3, which gave him a Superficial of B2 and a Mortal of B9. His "wound level step" is 1 (1/2 Forte exponent round down), which means there's no way to fit all of the wound levels in there without having at least two gaps.
Which way should it lean? I just had him stack them all up at 4-5-6-7.
Also, my players didn't comprehend why you wouldn't just stack up your wound levels at the high end of your range. I tried to explain to them that you could simulate a slightly less resilient character by moving some down into the lower ranges, but they all agreed that "gaming the system" was the way to go here and min-maxing anything they could was essential.
I tend to agree because combat is bad enough, but does anyone have a more convincing argument?
My group burned characters on Saturday. We had one character who had a Forte of B3, which gave him a Superficial of B2 and a Mortal of B9. His "wound level step" is 1 (1/2 Forte exponent round down), which means there's no way to fit all of the wound levels in there without having at least two gaps.
Which way should it lean? I just had him stack them all up at 4-5-6-7.
Also, my players didn't comprehend why you wouldn't just stack up your wound levels at the high end of your range. I tried to explain to them that you could simulate a slightly less resilient character by moving some down into the lower ranges, but they all agreed that "gaming the system" was the way to go here and min-maxing anything they could was essential.
I tend to agree because combat is bad enough, but does anyone have a more convincing argument?