View Full Version : PT vs overbearing
elgorade
03-01-2008, 09:33 AM
Can you use PT vs Overbearing in close combat? (Instead of using Power to resist.)
As written, it's for non-combat athletics. However, at this point in BE development* I would not deny a player who has Physical Training those versus tests.
*No one ever takes/uses PT. I'd like to encourage its use.
eruditus
03-01-2008, 02:57 PM
And to add to Luke's answer, you could always use it for helping or FoRKs, right?
- Don
eruditus
03-01-2008, 02:59 PM
oooo, I thought of a cool idea. Burn a piece of tech that would give you a trait to allow you to use it in close combat - like some exoskeliton rig that channels your athletic talent into combative force or a "technique" someone teaches you that allows you to do this (our idea of what "technology" is can be pretty loose, though. :)
elgorade
03-02-2008, 09:11 AM
I like that idea. Not that I don't like just using PT directly, but having a bit of "tech" to do it takes the idea out of the grey area.
Thanks
And to add to Luke's answer, you could always use it for helping or FoRKs, right?
- Don
Help yes, but not a FoRK. You can't use FoRKs with stats or attributes.
Dave Lucas
03-03-2008, 03:08 PM
*No one ever takes/uses PT. I'd like to encourage its use.
I had a GM FoN get totally screwed (ie. mortally wounded) in a close-quarters mini-firefight because the PC's 2nd in command had Physical Training 2.
The ability to Advance where you want is pretty good.
elgorade
03-04-2008, 05:12 AM
*No one ever takes/uses PT. I'd like to encourage its use.
Mostly I can see it being used as a FoRK, but not as a primary skill. It helps you get to the remote location, but the point is getting there unobserved.
Of course, maybe that just means I don't have enough chase scenes.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.9 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.