Salar
03-13-2008, 11:18 AM
Hi all,
One thing that came up in my current Burning Gates of Hell game, is the giving of Artha for following a Belief and when that Artha should be given.
The situation is Conrad, an ex mercenary bodyguard with the Belief that he will "take on morally dubious acts so that others may be saved from sin", has agreed to kidnap a 9-year-old girl and deliver her to a crime lord (to be held as leverage over a rival gang member). However, the girl's father is now dead and the child's protector (and murderer of the father) is Conrad's brother, a priest. The priest has stated that the child will not be handed over, and in fact with the gang member dead, the child wouldn't be needed for leverage.
My question: At what point is Artha given for following a Belief. When the agreement is made, or when the act completed?
The way I played it (off the cuff, as it were) was to award the point when the agreement was made. My rationale? Conrad's player knew who the child was and the circumstances surrounding her when his character made the deal. He knew he was getting Conrad potentially into trouble, but still agreed. The fact that he then thought of a way of dealing with the crime lord so that the child didn't need to be handed over yet, (they owe the crime lord a favour, and the father of the child was the brother of the head of the rival gang and may still be used as a pawn) seemed to justify that decision.
Thoughts?
John
One thing that came up in my current Burning Gates of Hell game, is the giving of Artha for following a Belief and when that Artha should be given.
The situation is Conrad, an ex mercenary bodyguard with the Belief that he will "take on morally dubious acts so that others may be saved from sin", has agreed to kidnap a 9-year-old girl and deliver her to a crime lord (to be held as leverage over a rival gang member). However, the girl's father is now dead and the child's protector (and murderer of the father) is Conrad's brother, a priest. The priest has stated that the child will not be handed over, and in fact with the gang member dead, the child wouldn't be needed for leverage.
My question: At what point is Artha given for following a Belief. When the agreement is made, or when the act completed?
The way I played it (off the cuff, as it were) was to award the point when the agreement was made. My rationale? Conrad's player knew who the child was and the circumstances surrounding her when his character made the deal. He knew he was getting Conrad potentially into trouble, but still agreed. The fact that he then thought of a way of dealing with the crime lord so that the child didn't need to be handed over yet, (they owe the crime lord a favour, and the father of the child was the brother of the head of the rival gang and may still be used as a pawn) seemed to justify that decision.
Thoughts?
John